Russia’s eastern expansion

It has been a big week for Russia.  It expanded agreements with China for energy supply deliveries, rebuked the US on Iran sanctions, and Josef Stalin’s grandson lost a libel case against the Novaya Gazeta.

To give an idea of the geographical layout of Russian pipelines, I highly recommend all readers check this link at the EIA.

In particular I am going to look at Russia turning eastward towards China.  This is not the first time Russia has tried to connect with more eastern markets than its more traditional European focus.  A pipeline has long been planned to extend to the Pacific Ocean (near Vladivostok) which would then allow tankers to reach Japan, China, and potentially North American markets.  Simultaneously, pipelines are being extended farther west, bypassing the former Soviet Bloc countries, and into Germany, primarily via the Nord Stream pipeline (I will write a future entry on the Nord Stream pipeline, as I am intimately familiar with the topic, and its an interesting study). 

Distance difficulties aside, China makes a natural energy market for Russian gas exports.  Many attempts have been made to build a pipeline from the Caspian Sea fields and pipelines eastward, and to date none have proven feasible.  The political difficulties in western China (the recent flare-up in the conflict with the Uighurs is a key example) also make me believe this option is unfeasible for the Chinese government in any case.  A spur south from Russia bypasses this difficulty.  Increasing need for energy supplies also makes China a logical partner for Russia, rather than shipping gas west through congested pipelines.  As climate commitments and the need for cleaner air will eventually reduce Chinese use of coal-fired plants in exchange for natural gas-fired plants, they will need Russian natural gas.  It also provides a level of finanical security for Russia, which is highly dependent on natural gas revenues for its operations.

Purchaser diversity is important for Russia, for Russian security, and for international security.  At the same time, these pipeline expansions, which pass entirely through Russian or international territory/waters until they reach the receiving country, help strengthen Russia’s grasp on the former Soviet Bloc countries in the west.  Spats between the Ukraine and Russia have led to stopping deliveries which have impacted Europe.  By bypassing these countries (and expanding its base) the impacts on Russia are lessened.  However, I feel that Russian image concerns might be lessened by becoming a global energy power.  Rather than turning towards armaments, this might assuage the Russian psyche.  Imagine the US in the same place: we wouldn’t like going from a superpower to a power, and could gain prestige again in a variety of ways.  Energy production is one way to do this.

In sum, these are interesting developments that will need to be watched to see what actually happens.  I believe it will end up being a stabilizing influence, for the most part, but urge caution with regards to Russian actions in the west, as unlinking supplies from the pipeline networks in the west will weaken European influence over Russia.

One response to “Russia’s eastern expansion

  1. Estonian Fund for Nature (EFN) submitted an appeal to the Administrative Court of Vaasa concerning the munitions clearance permit issued by Western Finland Permitting Authority. Nord Stream AG has acquired the permit for clearing munitions in the Finnish waters as a part of the Russian–German natural gas pipeline project. According to the EU environmental impact assessment (EIA) directive and Espoo Convention, such permit can not be issued before the EIA of the whole project has not completed.
    According to EFN, the parts of the permit decision concerning the transboundary impacts to Estonia contain incorrect statements on impact assessment and risk analyses. The permitting authority has trusted explanations of the developer, without their critical examination. Estonian state authorities and scientists have pointed out several aspects according to which EIA, and in particular, the munitions clearance application, provided by Nord Stream AG is incomplete and inaccurate. That EIA has not adequately assessed impacts of toxicants in sediments which are resuspended by the clearance of munitions, affecting wildlife and human health.

    “The permit application concerning munitions clearance should be rejected as the environmental impact assessment is not finalized”, says CEO of EFN Jüri-Ott Salm. “Nord Stream AG is trying to split the project, using a practice referred to as “salami slicing” – splitting a large project to small parts to conduct them silently. The reports of the monitoring of the implementation of the EU EIA directive have brought examples of this practice as non-recommendable practice.”
    EFN has appealed to court in order to revise and halt the permit for munitions clearance until all international obligations have been fulfilled including provision of public with adequate environmental risk assessment.

    For more:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s