The climate talks in Copenhagen have ground to a halt, for the usual litany of reasons that have derailed any real action since the Rio Conference (Earth Summit) in 1992.
- It’s too expensive.
- It’s not our fault – it’s yours.
- We don’t want to delay economic development.
- It’s not really happening / God makes it happen / Denial
Those are four of what I consider to be the top reasons that states choose not to act in the face of overwhelming evidence for climate change. As I have said before, I do not care the causes for climate change. They are real and they are happening. At the best case, the chemicals societies spew into the air, water, and land are causing health impacts. At the worst, they are causing climate change that will devastate millions, if not billions of people.
However, the skeptics in the US are joining skeptics across the globe in an interesting Christian-Muslim alliance (sorry, couldn’t resist throwing that out there) — Senator Inhofe (whose Senate homepage, as of 12/15 had a nice pictorial icon for a link to a Senate Minority report) and Mohammad Al-Sabban (Saudi Arabia’s lead climate negotiator) are on the same page. Now, what has inspired this close alliance between these two parties? A love of black gold – OIL. Saudi Arabia, as many of you know, is the top exporter of oil. According to Sourcewatch.com Senator Inhofe received a meager $662,506 from oil companies between 2000 – 2008. Or, to put it in perspective, Senator Inhofe receives nearly twice as much per year on average from oil companies than the per capita GDP of the US (The CIA’s World Factbook puts US GDP/capita at $46,000).
Does the US, Europe, and other advanced economies bear the lion’s share for polluting the air with greenhouse gasses? Yes. Do we have a collective responsibility to help others deal with the impacts / help reduce the impacts of climate change? Yes. Does the developing world need to sit by and do nothing? No.
Developing countries need to do as much to reduce their contributions of greenhouse gasses as possible. This does include the need for clean technologies such as solar PV, and small wind and hydro to create clean electricity. But the developing countries need to realize that a political solution will never be possible unless they too are willing to abide by some metric for containing their emissions and environmental damage.
To think that others will do what you will not is the height of folly. It is why I believe the GOP arguments about climate change policy in the US being against national security is the height of stupidity. Most measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the US revolve around moving away from fossil fuels and on to renewables. A situation which will only reduce dependence on foreign oil, not increase it. Additionally, it is possible to imagine a situation where the US would become a net exporter of renewable energy sources — making foreign countries dependent on us, not the other way around. Why? Because last time I checked, the Arabian Peninsula was a pretty sunny place.